Aristotle's Politics
Aristotle's Politics
Wikipedia encyclopedia
The literary character of the Politics is subject to some dispute,
growing out of the textual difficulties that attended
the loss of Aristotle's works. Book III ends with a sentence that is
repeated almost verbatim at the start of Book VII, while the intervening
Books IV-VI seem to have a very different flavor from the rest; Book IV
seems to refer several times back to the discussion of the best regime
contained in Books VII-VIII.[1] Some editors have therefore inserted Books
VII-VIII after Book III. At the same time, however, references to the
"discourses on politics" that occur in the Nicomachean Ethics suggest
that the treatise as a whole ought to conclude with the discussion of
education that occurs in Book VIII of the Politics[citation needed].
Werner Jaeger suggested that the Politics actually represents the
conflation of two, distinct treatises.[2] The first (Books I-III, VI-VIII)
would represent a less mature work from when Aristotle had not yet fully
broken from Plato, and consequently show a greater emphasis on the best
regime. The second (Books IV-VI) would be more empirically minded, and thus
belong to a later stage of development.
Carnes Lord has argued against the sufficiency of this view, however,
noting the numerous cross-references between Jaeger's supposedly separate
works and questioning the difference in tone that Jaeger saw between them.
For example, Book IV explicitly notes the utility of examining actual
regimes (Jaeger's "empirical" focus) in determining the best regime
(Jaeger's "Platonic" focus). Instead, Lord suggests that the Politics is
indeed a finished treatise, and that Books VII and VIII do belong in betwee
n Books III and IV; he attributes their current ordering to a merely mechanical
transcription error.[3].
A third possibility is that Aristotle intended to reorganize the
already-completed Politics, but died before he was able to do so.
The initial treatise would have had Books VII-VIII in between Books III
and IV, but that later compilers altered the ordering based on an intended
revision suggested by the Nicomachean Ethics. This theory would require that
our version of the Nicomachean Ethics be later in date than our version of the Politics.

Commentaires
kzlo le 30/03/2007 à 18:23:20i think it s intersting to right to others not to ourselves
le 30/03/2007 à 18:36:24
i think it is interesting to wrte to others rather than writing to ourselves..........
Bennys